Supriem Rockefeller - The Self-proclaimed Antichrist

OK, I recently came across material referring to a guy called Supriem Rockefeller who claims that he is Lucifer Reincarnate and the Antichrist that prophesies have spoken off.

Apparently, Supriem (aka Supreme) has VERY big people and powers behind him and tonight I found a posting on CNN Money (here) that talks about how he is starting to build the third temple in Jerusalem (as mentioned in the book linked here).

More information and a book about him can be found at Wes Penre website here. I am still in the process of reading the material and was waiting until I finished before posting but when I came across the CNN post online today I thought I'd best give you guys the heads up, sooner rather than later, so you can judge for yourselves

Wes is also the author of the resource packed illuminati news.

Update...
Kinda freaky guys but this guy has his fingers in pretty much everything. A forum discssing him can be found here (along with links to information on some of his many businesses).

And for the record, yes, he does want a one world government (Allied union) and a one world currency (Allied Unit)!

Home

Iraq inquiry Whitewash

Watching Blair in the inquiry is dissapointingly futile. The panel spoonfeed him answers as they ask him questions!

Should his feathers get ruffled and he forget his lines, they lead him back again and frame the questions so as to provide him with answers!

You can follow the blog of the days inquiry here however, nowhere seems to be accepting comments anymore, maybe we have more to say on this than they want to hear?

Tough, as long as they use our money and resources to fund their wars, we WILL have our say!!!

Home

International Hearings assess whether swine flu pandemic was falsified

As reported in the Guardian article (here) the Parliamentary Assembly of The Council of Europe is to debate the PACE resolution which accuses drug companies of leaning on public health officials to alarm governments about the risks of H1N1 (swine) flu. A link to the PACE website is provided here.

gandeste.org reports on how the 47 nation body, encompassing democratically elected members of parliament, has begun hearings to "investigate whether the H1N1 swine flu pandemic was falsified or exaggerated in an attempt to profit from vaccine sales."

There has been an increasing amount of controversy over the swine flu "pandemic" which has come under criticism as being "hyped" out of proportion by agencies and organisations leading to countries ordering billions of dollars worth of flu vaccinations.

Tamiflu was recommended and prescribed by the World Health Organisation although many say that it can cause more damage than good, as shown in this Swine Flu article pdf or website link here.

Globalresearch.com assert that Donald Rumsfeld (Former US Defence secretary) is the main financial benefactor of Tamiflu as he is the largest stockholder of Roche Laboratories, the company which sells it, article here).

There are those that feel that the response to the emergence of swine flu was necessary to "play it safe" as shown in this article here. However, many feel that mass medicating of populations with drugs that have not been fully tested is not a risk worth taking, particularly as the total deaths from swine flu are much lower than those for seasonal flu.

Home

Bounty to Arrest Tony Blair for crimes against peace – Update

My article yesterday (here) had a link to a new website set up by George Monbiot which had the rather revolutionary idea of offering a bounty to people who attempted to perform a peaceful citizen’s arrest on Tony Blair.

The site (arrestblair.org) was opened on 25.01.10 and by 9am on 27.01.10 it had collected a donated bounty of £9432.00, giving some indication of how strongly members of the public feel that Tony Blair should be prosecuted for what was considered to be an illegal war by the government’s own legal advisors (here).

The payment method, for those donating to the bounty was originally paypal. However, paypal have now stopped accepting donations to the account so donations have to be made via bank transfers instead. While this is a slower way to donate, if people are serious about encouraging others to "give it a go", they still can.

Although Tony Blair advises us to “move on” from the Iraq war (something the thousands that have died in it are unable to do) others have asserted that if other world leaders have had to face trials for crimes they have committed, including wars, then the same should apply to Tony Blair.

Home

Verichips, RFID, Mark of the Beast

Video here on how these things are being introduced. Have you noticed that many children cannot now pay for meals with cash? Instead they are having to use card payment systems or, in my nephew's school for example, use thumbprints to access credit for meals!

When they have gotten rid of cash and passed the laws to make ID cards legal, it will be a crime not to have one. It is possible that this could then be used as a reason to legally require people to have implants, to "prevent people from being able to break the law".

Home

Government's legal advisors unanimously agreed that Iraq war was illegal!

In damning testimony from the governments legal advisors at the time preceeding and during the Iraq war were heard by the Chilcot Inquiry today.

The deputy legal advisor to the foreign office at the time, Elizabeth Wilmshurst, made her department’s position on the war clear today when she said the legal department disagreed with the war being lawful saying that “All of the lawyers dealing with the matter at the foreign office were entirely of one view”.

Wilmshurst went on to resign on the eve of the war as she did not feel that she could support the government going ahead with an illegal war. Her resignation letter, in which she pointed out that the planned invasion was a “crime of aggression” , had been altered by the government to conceal references about the disputed legality but was later fully released under the Freedom of Information Act.

Her boss, Sir Michael Wood, spoke of how Jack Straw had told him that he had often been told things were illegal but still went on to win in court. Although Sir Wood also considered resigning he understandably did not see why he should as long as he presents the situation honestly.

I say understandably as it would be wrong if the people who speak out against the criminal elements of the war to are the ones to loose their jobs. Those with an agenda that, to them, transcends law and the sufferings of war should be the ones to loose their jobs surely? Otherwise the whole system would just become more and more corrupt.

One could ask that if we had not been invaded, the British public were against the war and we clearly did not have a legal right to go to war, why did we?

A blog which follows the live proceedings of the Iraq inquiry can be found here

Home

Bounty offered for arrest of Tony Blair for crimes against peace

Last night George Monbiot, of the Guardian, called for civilians to conduct non-violent citizens arrest’s on Tony Blair for taking the UK to war with Iraq which many have condemned as a criminal act of aggression (see George Monbiot’s article here).

In addition he has set up a website where cash is donated to pool a bounty, a quarter of which will be paid to members of the public that attempt peaceful citizens arrest’s on Tony Blair for crimes against peace (arrestblair.org). At the time of publishing this article, the bounty has gathered to £3783.00 in a matter of days.

Monbiot’s thought provoking article cites, as Blair was made aware, that “Under the United Nations charter, two conditions must be met before a war can legally be waged. The parties to a dispute must first “seek a solution by negotiation” (article 33). They can take up arms without an explicit mandate from the UN security council only “if an armed attack occurs against [them]” (article 51). Neither of these conditions applied. The US and UK governments rejected Iraq’s attempts to negotiate. At one point the US state department even announced that it would “go into thwart mode” to prevent the Iraqis from resuming talks on weapons inspection (all references are on my website). Iraq had launched no armed attack against either nation.”

If there was no legal justification for going to war, then the thousands of Iraqi people that have died since they were invaded by Blair, Bush and their war machine, were actually victims of mass murder.

Although the Chilcot Inquiry is currently looking at the war in Iraq, as Monbiot points out, “there’s a problem with official inquiries in the United Kingdom: the government appoints their members and sets their terms of reference. It’s the equivalent of a criminal suspect being allowed to choose what the charges should be, who should judge his case and who should sit on the jury”.

Home

Bill Gates plays down Internet’s official online censorship by Beijing

Following Google’s decision to pull out of China, in response to online censorship and alleged attempts to hack into the email accounts of individuals of political interest to them as shown here (although this has been contended by Beijing, here) Bill Gates has criticised google’s stance.

Despite Hilary Clinton’s apparent support for Google’s decision (here), according to Bill Gates, accepting the censorship of different countries is just “part of doing business”. While Steve Ballmer, Microsoft chief executive, defended the censorship as he asserted that even countries with “extreme” free speech laws, such as the US, exercised some censorship (see Guardian article here).

While those championing the rights of free speech and an uncensored Internet may feel a greater kinship with Google over this issue, google has also come under criticism for their gathering and storing of the information of its users (here).

Google Watch points out that every email sent to or from a Gmail account is stored on google’s database, potentially forever, even if deleted from the inbox. This has concerned many people over the sheer amount of information that could be gathered on each user over a period of time and what could be done with it.

Home

Plans revealed for unmanned surveillance aircraft in the UK by 2012

As this Guardian article shows (here) “Police in the UK are planning to use unmanned spy drones, controversially deployed in Afghanistan, for the ­”routine” monitoring of antisocial motorists, ­protesters, agricultural thieves and fly-tippers, in a significant expansion of covert state surveillance.”

The recent information attained by the Guardian Paper which revealed the plans for the aircraft by the South Coast Partnership (a Home Office-backed project in which Kent police and others are developing a national drone plan with BAE) reveals how they planned to use the drones on the public, despite claims that they were intended for use over the English Channel.

It is becoming increasingly clear that authorities are prepared to use anti terrorism laws against members of the public in cases completely unrelated to terrorism (see article here on the controversial use of Terrorism Act (2000): deemed to infringe on the human rights of individuals by the European Court of Human Rights earlier this month).

Those that warned that this would be the case seem to be being proved right. More Guardian articles on the increasing amount of surveillance the UK is finding itself encumbered with can be found here.

Home

Another Earthquake hits Haiti

The Guardian reports on a second earthquake which hit Haiti today (here), only 8 days after earthquakes which left the country with millions in dire need of assistance.

As we continue to hear those in authority give reasons why the aid distribution is not occurring, such as not having depot's to transport the supplies to, up to 20,000 a day are said to be dying from a lack of medical supplies. Aid agencies have voiced their anger at the lack of distribution as tonnes of supplies are stockpiled and guarded from those they were sent to help.

Given that the size of Haiti is not particularly large, smaller than the state of Maryland, it seems bizarre that the aid has not yet been distributed to the affected parts of the island by the thousands of troops that are now based there. I wonder whether any perimeters have even been selected to receive aid, as even those close to where aid is stored say they have not received yet received any.

The UN has voted to send more troops but in what capacity will they be functioning? So far I have seen them guarding the food from those in need (why? It's actually there for the people, who are the UN to control if/when they can have it?) and herding the survivors around by banging their body length shields and shouting at them.

There seems to be a lack of regard for the peoples need to survive as evidenced by the footage of soldiers arresting those who are salvaging what they can from the rubble. Not to mention the lack of urgency to their food distribution methods.

If the people do not salvage it, it will go to waste! Why on earth should the people of Haiti have to walk past supplies they need when they are starving and aid is being held back from them? A more useful role for the UN would be to assist the people with salvage operations, rather than arresting them for it!

For example, can you imagine if a policeman had survived in the TV series "Lost" and had then started to arrest people for stripping the plane of things they could use? It would be ludicrous, and so is punishing the Haitian people for trying to find what they can to survive instead of helping them.

Perhaps it is time to give the Haitian people charge of distributing the supplies rather than the UN, particularly as some have said they are concerned about violence which prevents them from taking the food out to those in need? I for one feel those in need would not use fear as a reason to prevent supplies from being distributed.

Able bodied survivors would probably be more efficient at distributing the aid by hand, and at least they would know that the food, water and medical supplies they are so in need of have been released to them at last.

The awful thing is, it reminds me of the global population reduction agenda we hear about.

Home

Godfrey Bloom MEP Blunder: Speaking "on behalf of the financial services industry"

During the EU Commission confirmation meetings (shown on BBC's "The Record Europe" 18.01.10) Godfrey Bloom questioned EU Commissioner designate, Michel Barnier.

He opened his question by stating that he was speaking "on behalf of the financial services industry in London..."

Followed by an excellent response from the French Barnier "It surprised me to hear you say you're speaking for the financial sector, I thought you speak for your voters"

This was met by a round of applause from other MEP's and a very sheepish looking Godfrey Bloom!

I couldn't have put it better myself.

Home

Why the delay with Haiti aid distribution?

I have been growing increasingly appalled at the delays in distributing aid in Haiti. A week on and many have still received no help at all. Food and water are in desperately short supply and how do the media respond? By calling them "scavengers" and looters, both words with negative connotations!

To see such suffering and desperation makes my heart ache for them. To have so little, not know if or when you will get more must be a terrible burden to bear, particularly if you have a family. When the aid is being collected up, and drip fed out ( eg Sky news videos of crowds of waiting people and the military only letting one person at a time in, and slowly at that. Meanwhile, children line the fences, asking but not getting).

Surely, it would be more humane to hand those in reach some food instead of just making them watch and wait, it must seem like torture to them. Even asking them to pass the food back would be better than the painfully slow methods I've seen utilised to date. If the people knew that food was being shared more freely, those calling for a greater military presence might find that, that was sufficient to restore calm.

A greater military presence will only lead to more difficulties as those I have seen seem to be functioning as blockades and protectors of food stores rather than people. Tonight, sky news showed footage of military viciously attacking a Haitian man, as he lay on the floor, they kicked his body and head. This, to a survivor of such a huge natural disaster seems wrong in so many ways, who knows how many people that man had lost. Maybe someone needs to remind them that the people are the victims, they are grieving and we can only guess how much. On top of this they have to survive, the storing up of food, water and medical supplies is not helping that.

Kind of makes me wonder whether those in favour of reducing the global population could do any better at blocking vital aid if they were in control of operations themselves!

Home

European Courts rule that police's "arbitrary" use of "stop and search" laws (designed to combat terrorism) are illegal!

Some good news today guys. European courts ruled today that the "stop and search laws (designed to combat terrorism but used against the public without any need for suspicion of terrorism) are illegal!

This article highlights the flaws in such a law, eg that you are four times more likely to be stopped and search using section 44 of the Terrorism Act 2000 ) if you are black or Asian! Apparently, the use of these "counter-terror powers" has grown fourfold from 33,177 times in 2004 to more than 117,200 in 2008. Which makes me wonder how high these numbers could have risen if this law had been left in place.

The decision by the European Court of Human Rights follows their acknowledgement that the "arbitrary" use of section 44 impedes on a persons human rights, such as a right to privacy. The police should not have the right to randomly stop and search (and thereby potentially humiliate) members of the public in the manner in which they have been doing.

As a result, Parliament must now respond to those who have expressed concerns against section 44 by reviewing the law and its application.

The full Guardian article can be found here.

Home

Leaders of the World doing Satanic Salutes?

There are many, many photographs of world leaders and celebrities doing a hand signal which happens to be known as the satanic salute or "sign of the horns". A few examples are shown below, but more can be found by following this link or by doing a search for satanic salutes in a search engine.

While those defending the use of the hand signal have cited its alternative meanings, such as a the "Texas Longhorn" or "Texas UT" symbol, this does not explain why it would be used by European politicians. As for the hand signal shown by Obama, this variation is also the symbol for "I love you" in the sign language developed by Helen Keller.

The ambiguity of the gesture made in pictures such as these has resulted in speculation as to what is meant by the individual in their choice of signal and even if the intent is innocent, it does not seem particularly pertinent to keep on using it. Given the satanic connotations of the signal, one would think that the advisers of these world leaders would make them aware of this issue, if they are not already aware.

Politicians usually try not to commit acts in public which could have a negative impact on how they are viewed by the public. If ever there was a signal that could be seen to have a negative meaning, then this is surely one of them. The Nazi salute for example, while it may be viewed as innocent by some, it would understandably cause offence to many if world leaders started to use it, something politicians are usually eager to avoid in the PC age we live in. The hand signals pictured below also have strongly negative interpretations attached to them so my advice would be, if you don't want people to think you worship satan, then I would avoid using what is known as his salute, regardless of any alternative meanings for it!



Barack Obama (USA President)


Mr & Mrs Bush (Former USA President & First Lady)



Sarkozy (French President)

Pope Benedict XVI (Current Pope)


Link to a website with more pictures and information

Home

Decoding the Past Videos on Freemasons and 2012

These programmes can be seen on the History Channel and are worth a watch. As the video's linked to here are the full episodes, the quality is not too high. However, higher quality versions (split into clips of around 10 minutes each) can be found on youtube if you search for them.

Freemason Documentary - This video goes into some of the history of the Freemasons, including some on their involvement with the Illuminati (referred to as the "Enlightened" in this video).

2012 Documentary - A good starting point for those who want to know more about the interest surrounding the 2012 end of the world prophecies.

Home

Bilderberg Group Meetings confirmed! It is not a conspiracy theory!

You may have seen me refer to Bilderberg Group meetings earlier in the website. Well, despite often being referred to as a conspiracy (despite the many videos and evidence of such meetings) they have been confirmed as taking place by the Chairman of the Bilderberg Group, Viscount Etienne Davignon (corporate director and former European Commissioner) during an interview with BBC News. The interview can be read here.

Rather refreshingly (or is that boldly?) no attempt is made to deny the existence of the group, or the meetings, nor the fact that leaders such as Tony Blair, Gordon Brown and Margret Thatcher attended meetings with the Bilderberg Group before being elected to be Prime Minister. Wikipedia has a list of people said to have attended Bilderberg meetings, the list includes politicians (eg Peter Mendleson), Royalty, media and businessmen from around the world. Despite the international nature of these meetings, what they meet about is kept completely secret.

This makes me wonder, if the existence of these meetings is an acknowledged fact, why are they referred to as a conspiracy theory and why are they so unknown about by the public?

BBC News Interview with Chairman of the Bilderberg Group

BBC News Article on the Bilderberg Group

Illuminati and New World Order Videos

Links to videos on the Illuminati and New World Order:

This is definitely the video to watch if you want to know more about 9/11 (the unofficial version), New World order and more. Highly recommended!!! Click here for "New World Order: The Facts" video

Another video on The Illuminati and New World Order (be warned, this one's a couple hours long!) Cick here for "The Illuminati" video


Click here for a bit of background info on the New World Order

American "Concentration camps" and Military Law

There are many reports (and videos) of hundreds of fully operational "concentration camps" in America (you can search google or youtube to see some of them). While these camps are currently said to be empty (except for the staff and security at the bases) one wonders why America would need these (said to house on average 20,000 people each).

One theory circulating on the Internet is that they could be used as a place to put those who do conform if martial law is declared in America. While this may sound extreme, Bush Jr has already legislation into place for a president of the USA to be able to declare martial law, under certain circumstances. If martial law is declared the constitution and rights currently held by people would be suspended (such as a right to a trial). Peoples property could be taken, they could be relocated, or detained (without trial), and the military could be utilised by the president to maintain the government and its decisions within America. For example, if martial law is declared, military forces could be called upon to deal with domestic (American) situations if the domestic agencies (eg police) fail, or refuse, to carry out the orders of the government. It is important to note, that this legislation could be used on Americans and Non-Americans alike if they are in the USA.

Website links to:-

Article on American Concentration Camps

Video on American Concentration Camps

Article on martial law in the USA

Law changes in America and how Americans are at risk of losing their constitutional rights.

Full Copy of the legislation: National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) from 2007 (see section 1076)

Home

Big Brother UK!

As this article in the Guardian shows, anti terrorism laws are already being used to infringe many of the rights to privacy we previously held. Although they are said to be intended to combat terrorism, agencies and databases are being set up which collect the details of members of the public that do as little as "protest against duck hunting".

I know that there are some people who believe it when they hear that "only people with something to hide would object" to the ever growing list of rights to privacy being stripped away, but how many of us really want to be treated like criminals for expressing our views and standing up for what we feel to be right?

For the Guardian's article, you can click here.

Home

Keeping you informed:-

The following website Globalresearch.ca has interesting articles from around the world which shows how "the powers that be" are making the New World Order a reality.

Click here to visit the site.

Example of Articles:-

Sarkozy plans for mandatory swine flu vaccinations: This also discusses whether there ever was a swine flu pandemic and criticisms made of the agencies (such as the World Health Organisation (WHO)). It also points out the interesting fact that Donald Rumsfeld (Former US Defence secretary) is the main financial benefactor of tamiflu (recommended and prescribed by the WHO, despite the fact that it can cause more damage than good for some) as he is the largest stockholder of Roche Laboratories, the company which sells it.

Home