Government "declare war" on Climate change sceptics!

As noted in this Guardian article here it seems that the government has decided that those who do not blindly accept the case for man made climate change, regardless of how questionable the data used to bolster the case, are now considered "profoundly dangerous"

It is concerning that an issue that should only be based on science, which by its very nature tests differing hypothesis to arrive at conclusions, is deemed by the government to be irrefutable and unquestionable. Particularly as so many prominent scientists disagree with the government's position.

According to Mr Miliband, it is not who you are but rather, what you say, that determines whether they consider you to be "profoundly dangerous". So if you are an established scientist, with meaningful data that does not conform to their view, do not expect to be heard out!

The government's position of "no discussion" sounds similar to their policies with those they consider to be terrorists, which I hope is not a sign of things to come. Particularly given the Pentagon's recent decision to put Climate Change on the military agenda as a possible "accelerant" to conflict (see article here).

One comment left in response, to the Guardian article, seemed to cover many of the concerns "sceptics" voice (ie those who still have an open mind or some degree of objectivity). I have attached the post in full below as many comments seem to be being deleted and I thought this one was worth saving:

Comment left by "Robbinghood" 31 Jan 2010, 2:01AM

"I am amazed that this country can have such dumbwits in charge of our economy and energy.policy. On second thoughts, I'm not surprised about anything that comes out of this wretched government.

First of all, Mr Miliband, no-one in the Labour administration has any right to lecture anyone on energy security. Of all the major economies in Europe, because of the complete lack of an energy policy since Labour has been in power, we in the UK the most vulnerable to disruption. Just bear in mind three things, please:

1. If it weren't for French nuclear power generation and the Interconnector, the lights would be going out in the UK on a regular basis TODAY not sometime in the future.
2. During the recent cold weather, some parts of British industry had their gas supplies cut off. I don't care how low the temperature went, or for how long, this action proves what a miserable job your 'government' has done in providing energy security. This was a national disgrace as well as costing the economy many millions.
3. A very large part of your strategy for UK energy 'security' is to make us dependent on some of the nastiest and potentially most unstable countries in the world for hydrocarbons., together with horrendously expensive technology (that provides lots of foreign jobs but relatively few in the UK itself) that cannot possibly be reliable.

Set against a backdrop of the UK having the greatest potential of any European country for complete energy self-sufficiency through a mix of indigenous hydrocarbons, coal, nuclear, tidal and wind, the state to which your 'government' has reduced this nation's energy situation is nothing short of catastrophe.

Turning to the issue of climate change, why am I not surprised that a Labour Minister tries to make light of cover ups, dodgy dossiers, and suppression of information? No. I'm not talking about Iraq or MPs expenses, I'm referring to the UEA, the IPCC, and Copenhagen. You and your colleagues may think that by saying the same thing over and over again, it somehow makes it come true but I assure you that fewer and fewer people are listening to you and the more hysterical you become in your defence of the indefensible, the more your audience will contract.

It would help you a bit more if the government were more honest on its approach to climate change taxes and other financial burdens this unproven predictions have placed upon our economy. Look at carbon cap and trade. Horrendously expensive, heavily abused by fraudsters and criticised across the spectrum, including the green lobby.

Look at the patently broken promises that the Climate Change levy on business would be fiscally neutral for business. Where do those billions raised by the climate change levy go, by the way, Mr Miliband? Apart from the many millions spent on cartoons and the annual £125million plus for that ridiculous quango, the Carbon Trust, there doesn't seem to be much hypothecation towards energy conservation or security.

So please, Mr Miliband, before you start waving your big stick at deniers and sceptics, get your own house in order first."

Home

Climate Change put on the military Agenda by Pentagon

As the story here shows, the Pentagon has now decided to put climate change on the military agenda. Despite recent revelations that, at least some of, the data used to make a case for climate change was known to be wrong by the IPCC, but was used anyway (see yesterday’s post).

Although they admit that climate change may not cause conflicts, they claim that it can be an accelerant for conflict.

It will be interesting to see whether this leads to future UN resolutions against countries they consider to be a risk (in terms of climate change) and whether that will be used as a reason for military action…

That reminds me of something... Oh yes, Problem-reaction-solution paradigm anyone?

Home

UN's IPCC use data they have been told is wrong to push the case for global warming

Following a revelation in a New Scientist article, the media recently reported that Senior members of the UN’s climate science body, including the vice-chair, admitted that a claim made in 2007, that Himalayan glaciers could melt away by 2035, was unfounded (as shown in Guardian article here).

This lead to Glaciologists asking for an apology as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Chairman, Rajendra Pachauri had claimed they used “voodoo science” when they were not in agreement with his (now known to be) inaccurate claims on the extent of glacier melt (as shown here).

The data he presented was used to inform the Copenhagen 2009 Climate conference and is reviewed and approved by the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change.

It was claimed by the IPCC Chairman, that he did not know of the error before the Copenhagen Summit, in which he presented the information. However, the Times disputed that claim today, as they say that before the summit, he was made aware “that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change assessment that the glaciers would disappear by 2035 was wrong, but he waited two months to correct it. He failed to act despite learning that the claim had been refuted by several leading glaciologists.” (Times article here).

This could be said to be another example of how some scientists seem to allow agenda’s to guide scientific advice.

Thankfully, there are still scientists that stand for principles such as scientific integrity, such as Professor David Nutt who lost his position as Chief Drugs Adviser on the government’s advisory panel (Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD)) after refusing to endorse the governments recommendations when his scientific research revealed that government policy was out of line with scientific findings.

His dismissal by the Home Secretary, Howard Johnston, resulted in other senior scientists resigning from their post in protest (earlier article here). This lead to the the formation of an independent drugs advisory panel, The Independent Council on Drug harms, by Professer Nutt and the majority of his colleagues that had resigned from ACMD.

The integrity of those giving us scientific advice is the measure of the value of that advice. Once agenda’s start guiding the advice, over real science, it becomes a pseudoscience and so looses any value it may have had. Indeed, you could ask, if the case for global warming is so strong, why would scientists have to resort to using data they have been told is inaccurate.

Climategate.com is one of many websites which assert that we are being duped into believing in a phenomena that doesn't exist. Why? To increase the amount of control that can be exerted over us and the amount of money they can take from us.

Home

Supriem Rockefeller - The Self-proclaimed Antichrist

OK, I recently came across material referring to a guy called Supriem Rockefeller who claims that he is Lucifer Reincarnate and the Antichrist that prophesies have spoken off.

Apparently, Supriem (aka Supreme) has VERY big people and powers behind him and tonight I found a posting on CNN Money (here) that talks about how he is starting to build the third temple in Jerusalem (as mentioned in the book linked here).

More information and a book about him can be found at Wes Penre website here. I am still in the process of reading the material and was waiting until I finished before posting but when I came across the CNN post online today I thought I'd best give you guys the heads up, sooner rather than later, so you can judge for yourselves

Wes is also the author of the resource packed illuminati news.

Update...
Kinda freaky guys but this guy has his fingers in pretty much everything. A forum discssing him can be found here (along with links to information on some of his many businesses).

And for the record, yes, he does want a one world government (Allied union) and a one world currency (Allied Unit)!

Home

International Hearings assess whether swine flu pandemic was falsified

As reported in the Guardian article (here) the Parliamentary Assembly of The Council of Europe is to debate the PACE resolution which accuses drug companies of leaning on public health officials to alarm governments about the risks of H1N1 (swine) flu. A link to the PACE website is provided here.

gandeste.org reports on how the 47 nation body, encompassing democratically elected members of parliament, has begun hearings to "investigate whether the H1N1 swine flu pandemic was falsified or exaggerated in an attempt to profit from vaccine sales."

There has been an increasing amount of controversy over the swine flu "pandemic" which has come under criticism as being "hyped" out of proportion by agencies and organisations leading to countries ordering billions of dollars worth of flu vaccinations.

Tamiflu was recommended and prescribed by the World Health Organisation although many say that it can cause more damage than good, as shown in this Swine Flu article pdf or website link here.

Globalresearch.com assert that Donald Rumsfeld (Former US Defence secretary) is the main financial benefactor of Tamiflu as he is the largest stockholder of Roche Laboratories, the company which sells it, article here).

There are those that feel that the response to the emergence of swine flu was necessary to "play it safe" as shown in this article here. However, many feel that mass medicating of populations with drugs that have not been fully tested is not a risk worth taking, particularly as the total deaths from swine flu are much lower than those for seasonal flu.

Home

Verichips, RFID, Mark of the Beast

Video here on how these things are being introduced. Have you noticed that many children cannot now pay for meals with cash? Instead they are having to use card payment systems or, in my nephew's school for example, use thumbprints to access credit for meals!

When they have gotten rid of cash and passed the laws to make ID cards legal, it will be a crime not to have one. It is possible that this could then be used as a reason to legally require people to have implants, to "prevent people from being able to break the law".

Home

European Courts rule that police's "arbitrary" use of "stop and search" laws (designed to combat terrorism) are illegal!

Some good news today guys. European courts ruled today that the "stop and search laws (designed to combat terrorism but used against the public without any need for suspicion of terrorism) are illegal!

This article highlights the flaws in such a law, eg that you are four times more likely to be stopped and search using section 44 of the Terrorism Act 2000 ) if you are black or Asian! Apparently, the use of these "counter-terror powers" has grown fourfold from 33,177 times in 2004 to more than 117,200 in 2008. Which makes me wonder how high these numbers could have risen if this law had been left in place.

The decision by the European Court of Human Rights follows their acknowledgement that the "arbitrary" use of section 44 impedes on a persons human rights, such as a right to privacy. The police should not have the right to randomly stop and search (and thereby potentially humiliate) members of the public in the manner in which they have been doing.

As a result, Parliament must now respond to those who have expressed concerns against section 44 by reviewing the law and its application.

The full Guardian article can be found here.

Home

Leaders of the World doing Satanic Salutes?

There are many, many photographs of world leaders and celebrities doing a hand signal which happens to be known as the satanic salute or "sign of the horns". A few examples are shown below, but more can be found by following this link or by doing a search for satanic salutes in a search engine.

While those defending the use of the hand signal have cited its alternative meanings, such as a the "Texas Longhorn" or "Texas UT" symbol, this does not explain why it would be used by European politicians. As for the hand signal shown by Obama, this variation is also the symbol for "I love you" in the sign language developed by Helen Keller.

The ambiguity of the gesture made in pictures such as these has resulted in speculation as to what is meant by the individual in their choice of signal and even if the intent is innocent, it does not seem particularly pertinent to keep on using it. Given the satanic connotations of the signal, one would think that the advisers of these world leaders would make them aware of this issue, if they are not already aware.

Politicians usually try not to commit acts in public which could have a negative impact on how they are viewed by the public. If ever there was a signal that could be seen to have a negative meaning, then this is surely one of them. The Nazi salute for example, while it may be viewed as innocent by some, it would understandably cause offence to many if world leaders started to use it, something politicians are usually eager to avoid in the PC age we live in. The hand signals pictured below also have strongly negative interpretations attached to them so my advice would be, if you don't want people to think you worship satan, then I would avoid using what is known as his salute, regardless of any alternative meanings for it!



Barack Obama (USA President)


Mr & Mrs Bush (Former USA President & First Lady)



Sarkozy (French President)

Pope Benedict XVI (Current Pope)


Link to a website with more pictures and information

Home

Decoding the Past Videos on Freemasons and 2012

These programmes can be seen on the History Channel and are worth a watch. As the video's linked to here are the full episodes, the quality is not too high. However, higher quality versions (split into clips of around 10 minutes each) can be found on youtube if you search for them.

Freemason Documentary - This video goes into some of the history of the Freemasons, including some on their involvement with the Illuminati (referred to as the "Enlightened" in this video).

2012 Documentary - A good starting point for those who want to know more about the interest surrounding the 2012 end of the world prophecies.

Home

Illuminati and New World Order Videos

Links to videos on the Illuminati and New World Order:

This is definitely the video to watch if you want to know more about 9/11 (the unofficial version), New World order and more. Highly recommended!!! Click here for "New World Order: The Facts" video

Another video on The Illuminati and New World Order (be warned, this one's a couple hours long!) Cick here for "The Illuminati" video


Click here for a bit of background info on the New World Order

American "Concentration camps" and Military Law

There are many reports (and videos) of hundreds of fully operational "concentration camps" in America (you can search google or youtube to see some of them). While these camps are currently said to be empty (except for the staff and security at the bases) one wonders why America would need these (said to house on average 20,000 people each).

One theory circulating on the Internet is that they could be used as a place to put those who do conform if martial law is declared in America. While this may sound extreme, Bush Jr has already legislation into place for a president of the USA to be able to declare martial law, under certain circumstances. If martial law is declared the constitution and rights currently held by people would be suspended (such as a right to a trial). Peoples property could be taken, they could be relocated, or detained (without trial), and the military could be utilised by the president to maintain the government and its decisions within America. For example, if martial law is declared, military forces could be called upon to deal with domestic (American) situations if the domestic agencies (eg police) fail, or refuse, to carry out the orders of the government. It is important to note, that this legislation could be used on Americans and Non-Americans alike if they are in the USA.

Website links to:-

Article on American Concentration Camps

Video on American Concentration Camps

Article on martial law in the USA

Law changes in America and how Americans are at risk of losing their constitutional rights.

Full Copy of the legislation: National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) from 2007 (see section 1076)

Home

Big Brother UK!

As this article in the Guardian shows, anti terrorism laws are already being used to infringe many of the rights to privacy we previously held. Although they are said to be intended to combat terrorism, agencies and databases are being set up which collect the details of members of the public that do as little as "protest against duck hunting".

I know that there are some people who believe it when they hear that "only people with something to hide would object" to the ever growing list of rights to privacy being stripped away, but how many of us really want to be treated like criminals for expressing our views and standing up for what we feel to be right?

For the Guardian's article, you can click here.

Home

Keeping you informed:-

The following website Globalresearch.ca has interesting articles from around the world which shows how "the powers that be" are making the New World Order a reality.

Click here to visit the site.

Example of Articles:-

Sarkozy plans for mandatory swine flu vaccinations: This also discusses whether there ever was a swine flu pandemic and criticisms made of the agencies (such as the World Health Organisation (WHO)). It also points out the interesting fact that Donald Rumsfeld (Former US Defence secretary) is the main financial benefactor of tamiflu (recommended and prescribed by the WHO, despite the fact that it can cause more damage than good for some) as he is the largest stockholder of Roche Laboratories, the company which sells it.

Home

Future Topics

I shall add further topics in the future covering issues listed below, amongst others. I would encourage you to research any of these topics, if they interest you, in the meantime. You may be surprised at how much information is out there.

Future Topics:-

Fluoridation of water supplies - Fluoride is a neurotoxin that was used in Nazi concentration camps to keep the population subdued, yet it is being added to some of our water supplies. This is despite public protest, the dental problems it can cause (such as fluorosis, which can cause people to loose their teeth) and other (potentially more serious) health complications.

Medicating the population via the water supply is also said to be contrary to European Laws. Article 35 of the European Charter of Fundamental Rights for example, promises that "...A high level of human health protection shall be ensured in the definition and implementation of all Union policies and activities." but with such question remaining over the risks of water fluoridation, can one be sure that we are receiving this?

Here's a link to a Video on water fluoridation.

Wikipedia entry


Food Additives - Many things added to foods, such as Aspartame (artificial sweetener) and monosodium glutamate (MSG) have caused concern amongst consumers for the health risks they are linked to. Despite the availability of alternatives that do not have such risks, such as Stevia, and the fact that the World Health Organisation has received more complaints about aspartame than any other single substance, companies continue to use it in an ever growing range of products (check your labels guys). Click here for article on Aspartame.

Verichips/RFID/Mark of the Beast

Video here on how these are being introduced, have you noticed that many children cannot now pay for meals with cash? Instead they are having to use card payment systems, or in my nephews school thumbprinting to access credit for meals!

When they have gotten rid of cash and passed the laws to make ID cards legal, it will be a crime not to have one. Then they will say they have the "grounds" to legally require people to have implants to "prevent people from being able to break the law".

Global Population Control

Secret Clubs/Societies

Illuminati Bloodlines

Democracy?

What can be done?

Home

Bilderberg Group Meetings

The Bilderberg Group's meetings are described on Wikipedia as "an annual, unofficial, invitation-only conference of around 130 guests, most of whom are persons of influence in the fields of politics, banking, business, the military, and media. Each conference is held under intense security and secrecy". The secrecy surrounding these meetings, given the calibre of attendees, has resulted in those publicising their existence asserting that they are being used as opportunities for the global agenda for the following year to be discussed and determined by some of the most powerful people in the world.

Although little known of by members of the public, the existence of the group and its meetings have been acknowledged and even reported in the press with the Guardian ran a series on it which you can view here with more Guardian articles on Bilderberg here (also, see this Times newspaper article report here - In it, Lord Healey more or less confirms that the Bilderberg group would like to bring about the new world order being spoken about by truth/conspiracy theorists and Christians).

Despite these meetings being attended by the highest of officials, they refuse to disclose the purpose, contents or conclusion of the meetings. Exposers of the Bilderberg Group would like to know why our officials are meeting in secret and suggest that they are meeting to plan our futures behind closed doors, as shown in this video which questions who is really in control of our world.

The range of people that attend these meetings is quite amazing, though it is believed to vary each year, depending on what will be on the agenda for the coming year. A list of the members who are said to have attended this years meeting, between 14th to 16th May 2009 in Greece is provided below, courtesy of Prison Planet. However, there are many other websites and articles referring to this years Bilderberg meeting and those held in previous years so feel free to look them up for yourself. One website you may wish to visit is bilderberg.org as it is dedicated to this topic.

One of the lists circulating of those that attended the 2009 Bilderberg meeting can be found here.

Wikipedia also has a list of those that they say have attended one or more Bildeberg meetings in the past here.

Home

Alex Jones - the man that cannot be silenced

Alex Jones has been investigating truth theories and publicising his findings and thoughts via radio, TV and the internet. He's pretty charismatic (to put it mildly) and manages to get into places that others don't. He asks the questions many people want answers for and seeks to raise awareness of issues he feels are overlooked by the mass/main media. He then uses a variety of forums, as mentioned to pass that information on to the public.

Anyway, I'll post some links to some of his material online and you can decide what you think about him for yourself.

infowars.com - his website, quite a full and busy looking site. Has daily radio broadcasts.

Prison Planet - Lots of Alex Jones videos and articles

Endgame Video - This one is definately worth a watch too. It discusses how the new world order has been taking shape and what to watch out for.

Bohemian Grove Video - This is said to be a secret satanic meeting attended by members of the Illuminati. Alex Jones managed to get onto the grounds during a ceremony and this video is the result.

Obama Deception Video - I was one of those rooting for Obama, but have been increasingly disappointing to see how similar his policies seem to be to his predecessor. Despite having pretty much a clean slate to take anyone he wanted into congress he seems to have chosen people who are less likely to bring about change than George Bush himself! Why is that? Promises he made have all but disappeared eg ending the war in Iraq, closing Guantanomo Bay etc... Unfortunately, the more I research on him, the worse it seems to get. This video discusses whether Obama could be another part of the New World Order so you can watch and decide for yourself.

Home

Truth/Conspiracy theories - Video on Political and Economic domination

This is a highly informative and interesting look at how the current banking systems came to be and how they can be utilised to further the one world order plan of "the elites"

Click here for video: "Wake up Call" at 2 hours 29 minutes its quite lengthy but definitely worth a look in (in my opinion) if you want to see more of what could be occurring without most people even being aware.

Home